Connect Chicago Meetup Recap: Youth-Led Tech Program Lessons & Comcast Internet Essentials

Members of Chicago’s public computing and digital learning community come together every month to hear a presentation from a Connect Chicago Corporate Partner and a Connect Chicago featured program. Join us! Sign up at Meetup.com.

On September 3rd, the Connect Chicago Meetup group convened for a session on Youth-Led Tech Program Lessons & Comcast Internet Essentials. We learned about expansions to the Internet Essentials program from Comcast’s Director of External Affairs, Joe Higgins. Then, Smart Chicago gave a detailed, behind-the-scenes look at Youth-Led Tech Summer program – sharing everything from catering records to detailed curriculum.

CC Meetup 9.3.15

Meetup attendees hailed from LISC Chicago, the Chicago Public Library, Accenture, the Adler Planetarium, Microsoft Chicago, Comcast, Smart Chicago, Englewood Blue, BLUE1647, Hive Chicago, Galvanize Labs and United Way of Metropolitan Chicago, reinforcing the idea that connectivity and digital skills touch so many types of people and institutions across Chicago. 

Comcast Internet Essentials is a program serving low income families with children eligible for free and reduced lunch. The goal is to tear down the barriers to broadband adoption by offering training, reduced cost computers, and $9.95/month Internet access. In Chicago, Internet Essentials serves about 55,000 families – 26% of eligible families in Chicago. 

In his presentation, Joe outlined several new components to the Internet Essentials program:

  • Eligibility Expansion. Any student attending a school where over 50% of students are eligible for free or reduced lunch will automatically be enrolled in Internet Essentials
  • Faster Speeds. Internet Essentials download speeds will be 10 Mbps – up from 5 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi. All current and future Internet Essential customers can get a free Wi-Fi router

In addition to these expansions, Comcast is experimenting with a pilot senior technology program in San Francisco, CA and  Palm Beach County, Florida. The company also invested in a study evaluating the impact of its Internet Essentials Program which you can read here. 

After Comcast’s presentation, Smart Chicago’s Youth-Led Tech program organizers gave detailed overview of their open online documentation. These items would be of interest to anyone hoping to replicate or build on this youth summer program:

  • How do you recruit the youth that would benefit most from a program like this? Flyer, use SlideShare as a platform, and use tools like Wufoo and Zapier. It also helps to have program partners like Get IN Chicago
  • How do you hire neighborhood instructors that will resonate with and inspire the recruited youth? Read all about the Smart Chicago hiring process here
  • How do you feed 140 kids 2 meals each day over 6 weeks? See a spreadsheet of thousands of meals from dozens of vendors. This food fueled learning at 5 sites across Chicago and no doubt contributed to the >90% participant retention rate. You can read a longer blog post about catering from Smart Chicago’s Chris Walker
  • How do you implement 170+ hours of training, ultimately empowering and teaching youth to imagine and build their own websites? Youth-Led Tech’s day-by-day, hour-by-hour schedule is published online in pdf and word for other to use and improve on. See it here on SlideShare. 

You can watch the whole Youth-Led Tech graduation ceremony on YouTube. 140 students completed the program and earned their own laptops. Microsoft hosted the ceremony.

YLT grad ceremony 1As you can see from the highlights above, from the beginning of Youth-Led Tech, the program set out to document everything and share everything. We hope other digital skill-building programs in Chicago will adopt similar practices, ultimately strengthening the City’s entire digital learning ecosystem.

Access the entire Connect Chicago Meetup presentation here on Google Slides. You can access the meeting notes here.

Black Tech Mecca at Chi Hack Night

172-black-tech-meccaFor the 172nd Chi Hack Night, Black Tech Mecca presented their plan to make Chicago a beacon in the black, tech, and global communities.

Black Tech Mecca launched on June 23rd with an event at Chicago’s Techweek with a goal to make Chicago the place for black tech.

Founder Fabian Elliot opened up the presentation by talking about why Chicago is best suited to become the black tech mecca. Elliot cites Chicago’s tech scene and city technology plan as key advantages as well as Chicago’s role in the US Black community.

Black Tech Mecca’s will implement a connect and direct strategy that will build a directory on steroids.  While Chicago has a number of resources for tech startups, it can be difficult to navigate. Their plan is to build out the directory and create a strategy to ensure that the community is signed up.

The team has begun to build up their team and understanding their challenges in building out the project. One issue is that they currently don’t have the manpower to build the completed project. As part of the solution, the team will be hosting a hackathon to get more people and ideas involved.

If you want to get involved, you can check out their website at http://blacktechmecca.org/ or follow along on Twitter at @BlackTechMecca

Food For Thought: Catering the Youth-Led Tech Program

In my first week at the Smart Chicago Collaborative I met with my new colleagues about our rapidly approaching summer project, Youth-Led Tech. I came to learn that this was to be a 6-week program for 13 – 18 year old youth in Austin, Englewood, Humboldt Park, North Lawndale, and Roseland in about two weeks. I furiously scratched notes into my legal pad as they discussed loose ends.

I followed their volley silently for a while before Kyla Williams, Director of Operations, turned to me, “Chris, the food is going to be your first project,” Kyla’s initial delivery was lighthearted enough. She continued, “The food is an important task, and may keep them coming back. Feed them well.”

Our aim was to support local caterers— that meant booking at least five, one per neighborhood. We were looking at 10 meals a week, per site, for 6 weeks. In the end, we used more than forty vendors to serve more than 6,000 meals. This post documents that process.

Sourcing

I began my task on Yelp searching first for “caterers” by our site address. This yielded few results. I saw dozens of photos of lavish weddings, massive corporate events. I browsed for hours— “These kids are not going to want foie gras. I don’t even know what monkfish is,” I was coming up with virtually nothing and getting bogged down constructing daily menus.

We wanted this to be a treat for them, not stereotypical camp slop. I remember speaking on the phone with one of our community partners referred her kids to the program, she was trying to determine if this program was legitimate and if they truly would receive a laptop at the end as she saw indicated on the flier. It saddened me to think of all the hollow programs that must have crossed her desk over the years. I assured her that we would deliver on our claims; when I told her that we would not only be providing lunch but that it would be catered she laughed in disbelief and asked if she could sit in.

As I continued my search I ran into some bumps: how local is local really. Is five miles local? In my home state of New Jersey- yes. In Chicago, the most segregated city in the U.S., 5 blocks away can feel like a different country. The answer was no.

These invisible boundaries came into play often. Sometimes it was laughable like when we learned that the kids in our Austin location were debating about Harold’s Chicken vs. Uncle Remus’.

The further my search was from the Loop, the less caterers would pop up and all of them were beyond the budget. I was relying too heavily on Yelp’s search algorithm. This is when I began to Google catering search engines instead. This is how I discovered

Cater2me

Cater2me presents itself as a catering service that pairs office workers with local food vendors. I submitted my crisis and guidelines online and someone called me within minutes.

The number one advantage is that suddenly there is a team of catering experts working for you. Account Manager, Amy Boonjathai, and I navigated a series of time crunches together. She was always reachable and I could tell from the tension in her voice she was working hard trying to do her best for me.  You tell them your guidelines i.e. headcount, allergies, serve times, food preferences and they handle the rest. If done right, it can be a very hands off process. Secondly, they produced two large invoices for two weeks of food, which cut down on paperwork

On the negative side, restaurants sign up to work with C2M. Because of this, C2M cannot order from any restaurant of your choosing. This presents a few problems:

  1. It’s a relatively new company, few restaurants = little food variation for a long term program
  2. It’s not local by site. At all. Numerous orders came from Courageous Bakery in Elmhurst, IL. Our closest site is 11.8 miles away from that
  3. Relatively costly— it was difficult to stay in budget
  4. The two large invoices weren’t broken up by location, this made it tedious to separate them out. It was also clear that they weren’t used to these kinds of large orders to multiple locations
  5. The scrolling timeline layout was visually appealing but made it difficult to follow the past orders. Again, it was clear that they’re not accustomed to long term ordering

As the kids became unsatisfied with the food choices and we saw how costly this process was, we abandoned Cater2me to search for tastier less expensive options.

When we surveyed the kids for breakfast opinions, cereal was requested repeatedly. We realized that their needs were surprisingly basic. Tasty and inexpensive, but how would we get it there? With the exception of the floaters (instructors who moved among the locations to serve on days off for the assigned instructors), all of the instructors lived in or near the neighborhoods in which they taught.

The simplest option would be to have them pick groceries up, but this wasn’t possible, since expenses were not included in the instructor’s contracts. Besides, we needed them to be well rested and engaged with the kids all day, not doing grocery runs at 8 AM.

Consultant Christopher Whitaker and program manager Adam Garcia were available to deliver supplies, but not on a daily basis. The circuit from our headquarters to the 5 sites is 46.7 miles and takes 1 hour and 36 minutes to complete without stopping. Doing that everyday before 10 AM was not something we wanted to put them up against.

Youth-Led Tech Sites

Youth-Led Tech Sites

Instead, we looked into grocery delivery options. Our program was taking place in youth centers, schools, and church basements. Without reliable refrigerator space and oft changing needs, we needed a company to deliver quickly, frequently, and ideally, within 24 hours notice.

Grocery Delivery Services

Peapod was the first company that came to mind. Sadly, its structure isn’t built for speed, it’s built for reliability. When we have a situation like having our breakfast caterer cancel for the next day and we need breakfast for 30 at 10 AM Peapod isn’t equipped to handle it.

Instacart was the second suggestion and fit all of our criteria. I was drawn to its slick app interface and instant gratification- they promised to deliver in one hour! Unfortunately, it looks like the west and south sides of Chicago don’t fit their criteria. It delivered to zero of our program locations.

Crisp! Mobile Grocery saw the desperate need in those neighborhoods and built their whole model around it in 2013.

Crisp!

Program manager, Sonja Marziano, ran a CUTGroup test for them in May and thought they would be the perfect fit. Crisp! had a number of positives:

  1. Great customer service: When an order was incorrect or contained spoiled produce, they were swift with refunds and gave us gift cards for being loyal customers.
  2. Quick order time: Initially we could only order with 48 hours notice, but once we spoke directly with Mike Hyzy, the owner of the company, they accepted our orders with 24 hours notice.
  3. Flexible: In the drop down menu it’s not possible to select anything before 10 AM but we requested 9 AM and they delivered.

On the negative side:

  1. No reorder option: I had to select every item one by one for every address for each day
  2. Small inventory: Not a lot of options. I would often order for one location and try to order the same amount for another and they were out of stock
  3. Botched orders: they sometimes gave us incorrect items/ brought spoiled produce. It also seemed like they had one delivery truck, if they were late to one location the rest of our deliveries would also be late

Crisp! was working well for a couple of weeks but as we lost refrigerator access in a few locations we decided to revisit the catering options. This is when I discovered ezCater.

ezCater deems itself a catering marketplace and is targeted at office workers ordering food for meetings. Some positives:

  1. Great customer service: After all of our orders were paid in full I notified them that we were tax exempt and requested a tax refund. They do not have the processes in place to file us as tax exempt and instead gave us the refund out of pocket.
  2. Used search metrics that were important and convenient: cost per person/event date/ eat time/distance
  3. Larger set of vendors than Cater2me
  4. Easy to use interface

On the negative side:

  1. Not a large enough database of restaurants
  2. Not intended for long term catering: Forced to input my choices per meal, daily- that’s 50 meals a week

I used it for about two weeks but it became incredibly time consuming. We needed to find actual long term caterers for the program, as was the goal all along.

Various Other Catering Services

There are a number of other caterers worth calling out.

After ezCater was abandoned, I began the second batch of searches for caterers that made food that was kid friendly, was in our budget, and was in the targeted neighborhoods.

At this point, after having to make a few emergency orders from GrubHub, I realized that because I was requesting 20-30 meals at a time, it was possible to simply search for restaurants that deliver. I knew that there must be more caterers than were showing up, ones that fit our criteria but had little to no online presence.

At least three were discovered that were perfect, but didn’t deliver. The reasoning behind a catering company that doesn’t deliver is lost on me.

D’Masti Catering

Since the beginning of the program, Roseland was using D’Masti Catering for breakfast and lunch. The owner, Kathy D’Mast and I had a rapport at this point. She would lay out the menu for the next week on the previous Wednesday, she knew the number of people, she knew the allergies, I could tell her what the kids enjoyed and what they didn’t. It was ideal.  She was kind, communicative, and easy to work with.

On the negative side, there was occasionally sloppy communication and they sent a juice container with black mold in the spout more than once.

Soul Vegan

The first caterer that we tried post ezCater was Soul Vegan. We set them up to deliver to Austin, Humboldt Park, and North Lawndale.

On the positive side, Soul Vegan is black-owned and neighborhood-based. They have a kind and passionate staff and they believed in our mission. They were interested in pairing it with their Peace Diet program.

On the negative side, the kids deeply disliked the food. Uniformly. That’s all that matters.

I should’ve known better than to think that kids and vegan food would mix. One of the instructors even compared the macaroni and cheese which is “typically a big hit” to prison food. That review, in addition to parents’ calls complaining about their hungry children, was enough to have us cancel by midweek and send supplemental lunches for the remaining days.

Lenore’s Kitchen

Englewood was back with Lenore’s Kitchen Catering, the company they began with the first week. I didn’t continue into the next week because I wanted to give them more variation. At the time I didn’t realize with that kind of long term contract, caterers tend to be more flexible. With all the ups and down we were experiencing, I sprinted back to them.

On the positive side, Lenore’s Kitchen is black-owned and neighborhood-based. They are easy to work with and communicative, and the youth consistently enjoyed the food. In the first week the breakfast options were too sweet— all pastries. However, they adjusted that and all was well.

Good Earth Catering

Good Earth Catering saved us from the Soul Vegan debacle along with some emergency GrubHub.

Good earth

 

On the positive side, they had the capacity to deliver to three locations, they were consistently on time or early, and were flexible to cancellations. The Catering Sales Manager was a delight to work with and very communicative.

On the negative side, they were hard to find and delivered a bad pizza once, otherwise, no other complaints. Good Earth was locked in for Austin, Humboldt Park, and North Lawndale by week 5 and was doing consistently well.

Dream Cafe

Englewood was a different story. Week 5 we finally secured Dream Cafe, the south side’s golden child. The Englewood kids had been singing their praises and suggesting them for weeks. In the initial planning phase I had tried to reach them many times but they didn’t have a voice mailbox setup. I tried tweeting at them as well, but never got a response. I finally reached them through their contact form online.

Once I got to them, they were a friendly staff, but they were consistently late, and had some quality issues multiple days in a row (kids complained of funky meat). They had a gas leak and had to cancel early- this is out of their control, however they said they would follow up for the future weeks of the program and never did.

Two tweets related to the August 4th reference the gas leak

Two tweets related to the August 4th gas leak

The scope of this catering project was huge. Over the course of 6 weeks we ended up serving 6,956 meals from 46 restaurants for the tidy sum of $58,764.28. It exposed the underbelly of the very real food deserts in Chicago and shows much work is left to be done. The giants and slick new comers in the industry like Peapod or Instacart aren’t accessible to these neighborhoods in need. Those organizations that are trying to fill those gaps like Crisp! and Dream Cafe don’t have a polished organizational structure. We’ve learned a lot more than we set out to and look forward to approaching it with this experience in coming years.

Lastly, here is the map of caterers, the green points are our Youth Led Tech sites:

YLT caterers

Calculating the Impact of Transit-Oriented Development in Chicago at ChiHackNight

metroplannersAt the last ChiHackNight, Yonah Freemark and Ryan Griffin-Stegink from the Metropolitan Planning Council gave a demonstration of Grow Chicago, a new website the Metropolitan Planning Council uses to advocate for transit-oriented development in the Chicago region.

Transit Oriented Development, sometimes shortened on Twitter to #TOD, is when a city zones the land with the intent of making the area more walkable. In practical terms, this means lowering the parking space requirement for buildings and enabling the development of pedestrian streets.

An example of transit oriented development is 1611 W Division which sits on top of a Blue Line station.

1611 W Division, photo courtesy of Streetsblog Chicago

An example of transit oriented development is the 1611 W Division apartment building in the Wicker Park neighborhood. The building sits on top of a CTA Blue Line station. For a building of it’s size, it would normally require a large parking structure. However, because it sits in a transit oriented development zone it doesn’t need one. The last ordinance that allowed for Transit Oriented Development was passed in 2013 with a new proposal to expand the areas currently being proposed by Mayor Emanuel.

As part of an effort to help promote Transit Oriented Development, MPC built Grow Chicago to help residents understand the impact of Transit Oriented Development.

The first part of the site helps users understand the benefits of transit oriented development. For example, people who live in TOD areas drive 40% less and tend to take more public transit.

The second feature lets you choose an area that’s been zoned for TOD and use sliders to determine the impact of different proposals. For example, for the 2240 N Milwaukee site a development that has 9000 square feet of retail and five stories of residential units will produce about $500,00 in tax revenue. Even at that density, the development would only be half as dense as the typical Chicago courtyard building. However, that type of development would only be allowed under MPC’s proposed recommendations.

grow3Even if you don’t have a specific address you’re curious about, you can use the app just to play around with any address.

The site also lists several case studies and examples of how transit oriented developments has helped communities.

To build the app, the Metropolitan Planning Council hired local firm Webitects.  (As a side note, the very first Chi Hack Night happened at their offices.)

The app uses data from Chicago Cityscape to help populate property information.

To get more information the campaign for transit oriented development go to http://growchicago.metroplanning.org/.

CUTGroup #15 – Chicago Public Schools (CPS.edu) Website

Mobile View of CPS.eduFor our fifteenth Civic User Testing Group session, we tested the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) website. This in-person test took place at one of the Connect Chicago locations – Chicago Public Library Roosevelt branch at 1101 W. Taylor Street.

Here is what the CPS website team said about why they wanted to do a CUTGroup test:

“We recently redesigned our website to be parent focused and mobile device friendly. We improved our search results, tagged content by topic and age level and created a district calendar. We are curious to know if the new design is meeting the needs of our parents.”

Ted Canji, Jay Van Patten, and Matt Riel, who redesigned the CPS website were interested in testing these things:

  • Find School Information: Can parents find a school easily? Do they use the School Locator? Do they use the search feature? Are parents comfortable using search?
  • Website usability: We wanted to discover if there are areas of the website that are challenging to use.
  • Mobile devices: We wanted to learn about how easy it is to visit the CPS website on a mobile device. We also wanted to know if parents have visited the CPS website before and learn more about how they get information about schools.

Segmenting

On March 25, we sent out an email to all of our 868 CUTGroup participants. We wanted to know if they would be available for an in-person test on April 1 for about 30-45 minutes. We asked some screening questions to gather information. When choosing testers the main priority was to get parents of CPS students who had children in different grades. In addition, we wanted testers who had different types of mobile devices and some who have lived in Chicago for a long time, as well as parents who were newer to Chicago or their neighborhood.

We ended up having 10 testers participate in this test. 8 of these testers were from our CUTGroup community, but one tester brought in two friends who drove her to the test, and since they qualified as CPS parents, we allowed them to test. They also signed up to be part of the CUTGroup.

Screening Questions

We heard from 35 CUTGroup members during our callout for testers. Here is what we learned from our screening questions:

  • 74% of CUTGroup respondents have children who go to Chicago Public Schools
  • 68% of CUTGroup respondents have lived in Chicago for over 20 years

Test Format

For this test, each tester was paired up with a proctor. They were asked to bring their mobile device, and the proctor asked questions about the CPS website and then captured those responses. We not only wanted testers to review the website and do tasks to see how easy the site was to use, but we also wanted to understand how testers normally got information about their child’s school. We were curious if they have ever used the CPS website before or went online to search for information about different schools.

Results

Finding School Information

Past experiences

When we asked testers whether or not they ever searched online for information about the schools that their children attend, overwhelmingly (7 out of 10) testers said “No.”

Parent of Three Girls (#9) says, “I have looked before when she was first starting for information about the school. I’ve heard a lot of stuff about the school, but I like her teachers, and I go off of that.”

When asked whether or not they have ever visited the CPS website, 7 out of 10 testers said “Yes.” This is how these testers used the CPS website in the past:

  • 3 testers used it to choose a new school or High School
  • 2 testers used it to check the calendar of events
  • 1 tester wanted to learn more about Local School Councils, and
  • 1 tester wanted to find out about after-school programs

We asked testers how easy it is to find information about schools, whether online or in person. Half of the testers answered right in the middle about how difficult or easy it was to find school information:

5 Very Easy                  20% (2)
4 Easy                          10% (1)
3 Neutral                   50% (5)
2 Difficult                     20% (2)
1 Very Difficult             0%

We learned that a lot of our testers find out what is happening in their children’s schools from communication with the teachers either via phone, parent/teacher conferences, notes, email. Testers also learn about about what is happening in their school from other parents, weekly email newsletters and communications with teachers.

During the test

When searching for their child’s school, 6 out of 10 testers used the School Locator, but all testers thought it was an easy time searching. Testers were then asked to tell us the most important and least important information on the school’s profile pages. The most important information testers called out included: address/contact information, progress reports, number of students, test scores, admission and graduation rates. When asked about the least important information, 4 testers said that all of the information was important to them.

When all testers were asked to use the School Locator tool and search for an address, we saw that about half of the testers had some degree of difficulty using this feature. 4 testers had trouble with viewing the map and filters when holding their phones vertically; 2 of these testers were testing with their iPhones, while the other 2 were on Android devices. When holding their phone vertically, testers only saw the list of school names, but when clicking on the name it would open more information on the map which was not on view for the tester. The tester would have to hold their phone horizontally in order to see both the map and the list.

Usability of CPS.edu

We were very interested in learning more about how parents searched when finding information from their school or about other topics. The CPS website team wanted to see if parents were comfortable using the search features. Therefore, we asked testers to search for information that they were interested in learning more about. Half of the testers clicked on the appropriate topics to find out more information, while the other half of the testers used the search box. Only three testers had trouble finding the information they were looking for.

When testers were asked to search for their child’s school (in any way that they wanted), 6 out of 10 of the testers used the School Locator. All testers thought it was an easy experience to find their child’s school.

Active in the schools (#1) said, “It didn’t take but a hot second, I typed in Lane and it popped right up.”

A few testers experienced slow load times for the next pages. For example, Meekmeek (#10) downloaded a PDF of the calendar because the calendar did not show up on her screen, but the PDF was difficult to read since she had to zoom in and out. When clicking on “Calendar” it showed a white screen, and took a very long time to load.

A few testers reached PDFs during their tests and either they were not as easy to use such as in Meekmeek’s(#10) case, or they did not load. Parent of Three Girls (#9) chose a PARCC article in the headlines. When clicking on it, she was asked to download a PDF. After downloading, she clicks to open it but gets an error message saying that she cannot open the file.

As mentioned above, during this test we learned the biggest improvement that could be made was the School Locator and changing the view from a horizontal layout to a vertical layout. In general, all testers said they liked the CPS website and most of them had an easy time using the website.

“I just think the website is better than it used to be!” – High School Parent (#5)

“It is very easy to use. I like that they give you the address, phone, type, classification, programs offered… I like that they tell you a lot.” –Parent of k (#8)

Mobile devices

Normally for CUTGroup tests, we encourage testers to bring their own phones and devices for testing. It is important that we not only test mobile-friendly websites, but that we test them on their own devices. We not only learn about usability issues on different types of phones, but we also better understand how testers navigate tasks on their own device. 5 testers tested on laptops that we provided, and here is a look at the devices the other 5 testers used:

  • iPhone 5
  • iPhone 6
  • Nexus 5
  • Boost ZTE Max
  • Android HTC Desire 10 Boost Mobile

Besides some of the issues we outlined above, most testers using a mobile device had an easy time navigating the new CPS website. We were excited to test a website that not only reaches so many parents in the city of Chicago, but are also excited as the CPS website team continues to redesign with mobile devices in mind. This CUTGroup opportunity was a great example of getting feedback directly from residents (and parents), on their own devices, while better understanding their own experiences when finding school information.

Changes to CPS.edu

Since this CUTGroup test, the CPS website design team has made enormous changes to the School Locator tool including instructional pop-overs to encourage parents to start their search, get more information, and provide details about the map legend and the tools available.

New CPS.edu School Locator Screenshot

Other updates include users are now able to find schools quickly by using a new “Find Schools Around Me” button or by pressing and holding down on the map to drop a pin and see nearby neighborhood schools. The CPS website team also added Google street view functionality to have an interactive view of the school and its surroundings. Lastly, the “Compare Schools” feature allows users to compare different schools, so parents can find the best option for their child using information such as number of students, student performance, ratings, and more.

The biggest change we saw as a direct response from our CUTGroup testers having difficulties with the School Locator. The mobile layout of the School Locator page is now in a full-screen format, and users do not need to turn their mobile devices horizontally or move around the page to see all of the information they need. It is exciting when changes like this happen and the feedback directly from CUTGroup testers continues to be influential to websites and software that is so wide-reaching.

Final Report

Here is a final report of the results with the analysis of the questions we asked, followed by each tester’s responses, and copies of other questions we asked:

The raw test data can be found below with the written answers from every tester.