Following up on the successful Divvy Data hack night last summer, Steven Vance and other developers will share what they have created to analyze station locations, track rides, and use hardware to know bike/station availability.
Photo courtesy of Steve Vance
Elliot Greenberger from Divvy will also be making a special announcement.
We’ll be live streaming the event here on this very blog! We’ll start our broadcast at about 6:15pm CST. Meeting notes will be posted here.
For our seventh Civic User Testing Group session, we wanted to get feedback on the EveryBlock iPhone app after EveryBlock relaunched on January 23, 2014. This in-person test took place at one of the Connect Chicago locations – Chicago Public Library Mayfair Branch at 4400 W. Lawrence Avenue in the Mayfair neighborhood.
EveryBlock lets you follow neighborhoods and get information about what is happening around you. From the EveryBlock Web site:
“Our goal is to help you be a better neighbor by giving you frequently updated neighborhood information, plus tools to have meaningful conversations with neighbors.”
We were interested in answers to these questions:
On February 5, we sent out an e-mail to 269 CUTGroup participants who said they had an iPhone as their primary or secondary device. We asked them if they would be willing to test a neighborhood app on February 10. We also asked some screening questions to gather extra information, and chose our group of participants based on a diverse selection of answers.
Here is a look at the distribution of iPhone users in our CUTGroup:
View iPhone Users for CUTGroup 7 in a full screen map
We were interested in having about 15 participants from different Chicago neighborhoods. We had 12 testers who came from neighborhoods across Chicago including Albany Park, Hermosa, Edgewater, Uptown, Logan Square, Auburn Gresham, and more. The furthest a tester traveled from their home location was 15.3 miles.
View CUTGroup 7 Participants in a full screen map
This in-person test was the first opportunity we had for every tester to be paired with a proctor. In previous tests, some testers were paired with proctors, while others would complete answer questions about the Web site or app through an online form.
Smart Chicago and EveryBlock staff (including a developer who worked on the app) acted as proctors for this test. We understood that there might risks in having EveryBlock staff ask questions to testers since biased responses might be captured. We asked that all EveryBlock staff not introduce themselves as staff or indicate that they were associated in any way to the app.
We received both positive and negative feedback from testers even with this format. We value this opportunity for developers to be involved in the CUTGroup process. The open communication and active involvement between developers and residents are key in developing Web sites and apps to improve lives in Chicago.
Are there any problems using the iPhone app? Does the app crash?
92% of testers liked the EveryBlock iPhone app, and most testers thought the app was easy to use. 4 out of 12 testers (33%) experienced a bug when using the app.
After signing up or opening the app, two testers experienced bugs on the first “Timeline” Page.
The app crashed when Amateur Student (#12) clicked on the New Post icon. In addition, the app crashed when Application Developer (#2) hit “Account Settings.” Once she made a post, the app did not redirect her to a new page, but instead went to a black page.
Do users have an easy time posting or commenting on the app? Do they find things they want to comment on?
New Comments:
New Posts:
Do users like the different pages in the app?
67% of testers thought that “Timeline” was the most useful page. As mentioned before, two testers did experience problems with this page, and this number could be even higher if these issues did not appear.
Would users use this app and in what scenarios might they post or comment? Would they use it “on the go”?
83% of testers liked the option of making posts on the go, 17% of testers were not sure if they would like it or thought they might use it rarely. The majority of testers thought this was a convenient option, and wants to comment on things while they are happening. One tester commented that she is a Twitter user and is used to this concept.
What do users want to see in the EveryBlock app?
While 75% of testers used EveryBlock, none of the testers ever used the iPhone app. Therefore, some testers had knowledge of the EveryBlock Web site and could compare these experiences. Testers who were familiar with the Web site were interested in having these features:
Here are some other suggestions:
One tester was shocked to find the post above during the test about a break-in because it included the poster’s full name and the address. This tester was concerned for her own privacy and was interested in knowing how her information would appear before she posted or commented.
Conclusion
Testers generally had positive experiences using the EveryBlock iPhone app. The biggest takeaway from this test is that users are interested in more features to filter and find the news most relevant to them. Testers were able to point out features from the EveryBlock Web site that they would want to see on the iPhone app. Including these features would allow users to have an experience that matches their experience on the EveryBlock Web site.
Here is a final report of the results with the key highlights from our CUTGroup test, followed by each tester’s responses, and copies of our e-mail campaigns and the questions we asked:
The raw test data can be found below with the complete answers from every tester.
Last week, Nat Zorach of the Handbuilt City came to hack night to talk about their efforts to purchase buildings using crowdfunding.
At the last Data Potluck, consultant and writer Q Ethan McCallum explained how to put Hadoop to work, and how to use Elastic MapReduce (EMR), the hosted Hadoop solution provided by Amazon Web Services.
Nat Zorach from The Handbuilt City will discuss how they use Fundrise to spur the development of affordable housing in Gary, IN and St Louis, MO..
Livestream starts on this very blog post at 6:15
For the past few Tuesdays, we’ve excerpted sections from Beyond Transparency: Open Data and the Future of Civic Innovation“, an anthology edited by Brett Goldstein with Lauren Dyson and published by Code for America.
I wrote a chapter titled, “Building a Smarter Chicago“, which I call “an illustrative, incomplete, and idiosyncratic look at the ecosystem in Chicago. It is meant to provide a thumbnail take on how the ecosystem developed here, while sparking fires elsewhere”. Here’s the last few sections, covering capital, products an the road ahead:
Without money, there is no sustainability.
As an ecosystem matures, it finds ways to adapt and grow. In technology and data, growing means capital. In Chicago, a main source of capital currently comes from philanthropic sources, though there are some stirrings in the market.
The first open government data apps contest—Apps for Metro Chicago—was primarily funded by the MacArthur Foundation (O’Brien, 2011). The contest was an important moment in the ecosystem—it was the first time that government and developers were brought together in the context of a project with cash prizes.
The Smart Chicago Collaborative, a civic organization devoted to improving lives in Chicago through technology, is funded by the MacArthur Foundation and the Chicago Community Trust. Additional funding came through the federal government’s Broadband Technology Opportunities Program, a program designed to expand access and adoption of broadband opportunities in communities across America (National Telecommunications and Information Administration, n.d.).
EveryBlock was funded by a $1 million grant from the Knight Foundation, and then was acquired by MSNBC. This was a test of using philanthropic money and open source as a basis for a business. There have not been many examples since then. This is a problem that needs to be fixed—we need more experimentation, more value.
A digital startup hub in Chicago, known as 1871, has a number of civic startups in their space, including Smart Chicago, Tracklytics, Purple Binder, and Data Made. As these organizations deliver more value, the entire civic innovation sector will attract more capital.
In order for the ecosystem to be self-sustaining, we have to create popular, scalable, and revenue-generating products with civic data.
Developers in Chicago are making a renewed focus on users. An example is the Civic User Testing Group run by Smart Chicago (Smart Chicago Collaborative, n.d.). We’ve spent years trying to get regular residents to participate in the product development process, and now we have more than five hundred people signed up in our first six months.
We have to do this—go beyond anecdote, beyond the cool app that lacks real traction, into creating business models and datasets that add value. We need to make products and services that people can’t live without.
This will require a mix of proprietary solutions, open source code, and shared standards. Companies need to follow viable product strategies—moving from one-off apps to sustainable systems. Interoperable data is a critical component to making this happen.
The good thing about this is that there are models to follow in other successful companies right here in Chicago. SitterCity is a vast consumer success story. OpenTable, Groupon, and GrubHub are all Chicago companies that found ways to reduce transaction friction in various markets.
They did this, in the main, with a strict attention to customers. In the civic innovation sector of the technology industry, we call those people “residents.” When you are serving people and make popular products, you are necessarily serving a civic need.
We’re beginning to focus on this work here in Chicago by adding value to civic data with unstructured public content, by creating systems around predictive analytics, and making baseline services, like Open311, that can serve future product needs.
This is a short take on a complicated subject that, in the end, has to be completely local. Hopefully, it gives some specific examples of how we’ve built an open data ecosystem in Chicago and points to how far we have to go.
Chicago has contributed, in our small way, but we have to be measured by how we contribute to the entirety of the internet, rather than this civic innovation subset. We’re ready to keep going, and we’re excited to share our models with the rest of the country and the world.
